Problems we were handed, and what we did with them
Each of these started as a business problem someone was already losing money or time to. Written from the buyer's side: what was broken, what we built, and what changed. Named where we have permission, anonymised where we do not.
3 written up in full
There are more engagements than there are case studies here, and the difference is permission rather than results.
Why Contract Review Is Slow: The Playbook Only Exists in Someone's Head
Every company that reviews contracts has a playbook — the rules its legal team has agreed it will and will not accept. It is a document, and it does not scale. The reviewer scales it, from memory, one contract at a time. Here is what we built instead.
Read the case study →A platform serving several family offices, each managing a separate family's capital — investments, entities, commitments and the paperwork that defines them.How a Multi-Family Office Made Its Own Documents Answerable
A family office's job is to know what a family owns and what it owes. That answer lived across an accounting system, a document drive, a calendar and an inbox — and could only be assembled by a person opening files. Here is how the platform that serves those families made the question answerable without giving anyone access to a second family's data.
Read the case study →A K-12 writing-curriculum publisher whose product is a methodology — an 11-episode course, two textbooks and 188 catalogued mini-lessons — sold to classroom teachers.How a K-12 Publisher Made 30 PDFs of Methodology Usable in a Classroom
A writing-curriculum publisher had 1.37 million characters of proven methodology and teachers who could not use it. The material was not the problem — finding the right piece of it at 7am on a Tuesday was. Here is how we made a catalogue answerable instead of searchable.
Read the case study →Why the list is short
It is short because of permission, not because of results.
Most of the work is under agreements that do not allow the client to be named, and one is under a permanent one. We will not describe an engagement in enough detail to identify a client who has not agreed to it, and we will not invent a reference to fill the gap. What we can offer instead is depth on the systems themselves — four products of our own, written up in full, plus a stack page that explains every choice.